THE BLOG ★ Ramblings on WiFi & stuff.

♻︎ Today's Quality Linkage

REVIEW: MEE Audio M6 PRO In-Ear Monitors. The $40 Earphones I can't Believe Exist

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes, 12 seconds. Contains 641 words

Yes, I am aware this has nothing to do with Wi-Fi, BAD, or otherwise, but we Wi-Fi guys (and gals) like to have nice things, don't we? Also, it's good to have some decent "buds" (earbuds) when studying, or working from say, a coffee shop. :-)

A few months back I lost my beloved Shure SE525-CL In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) due to carelessness on my part (for which I have imparted unending flagellation upon myself). I have since been using my Apple EarPods, or my wife's Beats Solo headphones, while I bide my time replacing my lost Shures.

Every now and then I'll do a search on the InterWebs ™ for "best earphones under $100". I've tried a few with poor results. I don't remember exactly how I got around to finding the MEEs, but I'm glad I did.

The first review I found for them was overly effusive, which to me is a dead give-away for not believing it, so I kept looking. After the 4th, or 5th review I was thinking there must be something to these things. So, I checked on Amazon and there they were for $40, in Clear no less (just like my Shures)! I figured for $40 bucks I'd take a chance on these.

Two days later a lovely, smiling, Amazon Prime box arrive with the acquired loot. I promptly opened it and was surprised by the quality of the packaging - it felt very high-end.

I opened the box and was surprised again by the quality of the included items:

  • A very nice carrying case
  • Earbuds (of course)
  • Detachable cables (1 with Mic & volume controls for phone use, and 1 without)
  • A bag of 6 pair of ear tips
  • 1 set of Comply ear tips (that's what I'm using)
  • And a 1/4" headphone adapter for use with stereos and what not.

All this for $40? Yup. So, we have some nice packaging, but how do they sound? Well, they sound like the best $40 earphones I've ever heard. Yeah, that's not much of an assessment, I know, but I'm just passing time here until I can pull the trigger on another set of $500 earphones. Until then, these fit the bill just fine.

If you're like me - not ready to be spending several hundred dollars on Pro IEMs, but still want something that sounds good, then these are a no-brainer. The build quality is better than it should be, and the sound is not only good, but "Sound-Isolating". Yeah, for $40 you get a good set of earphones that block out sound really well.  Not by any fancy noise-cancelling technology, but just good, foamy isolation, from the tips that come in the box.

If I were to describe the sound I would say their bassier than I would like, and the highs are not nearly as smooth as my Shures were. They're more "shrill" in that regard. But, with a little EQ adjustment they sound, for lack of a better word, good.

I primarily use earphones when I am trying to get stuff done, or traveling on an airplane, to block out the noise. Anyone who follows me on Twitter knows I spend a lot of time in coffee shops. I have an office, but for me, getting out, finding a secluded corner, putting on my earphones, turning on my Noizio app (for the appropriate amount of thunder & rain), my Film Score and Mozart playlists, helps me focus, and keeps me from being distracted. These earbuds fit the bill for me. Good isolation and good sound.

Look, these WILL NOT be competing with high-end IEMs. They're not gonna beat Shure, Etymotic, or Westone. But, if you're looking for a good pair of earphones for under $100, heck under $50, you can't go wrong with the MEE Audio M6 PRO In-Ear Monitors. 

 

LINKS:

MEE Audio M6 on Amazon $40

Shure SE535-CL Earphones $449

“Gigabit” Wi-Fi Hits the Big Apple?

Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 47 seconds. Contains 359 words

Recently, I’ve been intrigued by the LinkNYC Project. It sounds like a pretty fantastic thing: Free, high-speed, Internet for everyone in New York City. They are also rolling out Hotspot 2.0 with this as well, so this peeks my interest even more. Of course, being a wireless professional, and nit-picky, there are things that beg questioning.

The first is the use of the term “Gigabit Wi-Fi”, which is brought up a multiple times in this article and interview with Engadget. Of course, the first thing to happen, when they go live, is Twitter will blow up with, “I’m using the LinkNYC Wi-Fi and I'm not getting a Gigabit! What a bunch of liars!!!”, or something to that affect. Because, no one is ever going to see those speeds, regardless of how awesome it's purported to be. 

It’s not that they don’t have the backhaul for it - they do. Fiber is being run to all the kiosk locations - with some exceptions for areas where it's not an option. But, this is the same message we get from wireless vendors that market their "Gigabit" Wi-Fi products, and as we all know - that’s not the reality for many reasons:

  • Half-Duplex requiring CSMA/CA which adds overhead and thus reduces actual throughput to ~60% of the link rate.
  • The massive number of users that will be connecting to each AP. Remember, this is a SHARED medium. "One ping, Vasili. One ping only."
  • The various device capabilities
  • Link rate for clients that vary on their distance, etc.

The other thing that concerns me is this:

I don’t get this image. That’s cleary a Ruckus AP. But, it’s upside down - isn't it? And, it’s surrounded by metal. Maybe they weren’t finished with the install? But, it looks like it’s pretty well mounted, and won't be moving anywhere.

Don't get me wrong - I'm loving this whole concept. I think it's fantastic, and would love to see this spread to other communities. I'm just wondering if there were any wireless engineers involved in the design and deployment of this endeavor. It SEEMS like that's not optimal placement for that AP - which I assume is a down-tilt omni. Is that just some meI, or am I COMPLETELY wrong?

Seriously, I'm asking!


Large and in Charge ⇥

One big BAD-FI "Faux Pas" is the use of 80MHz channels in use in an enterprise environment. But, what makes it worse is that manufacturers aren't helping the matter:

via CommunicaONE Blog:

I don't blame the end-user here for this issue. The installer should have known that an 80MHz in an enterprise environment is not practical, or viable. It was clear what had happened was  the defaults were left as it, and there was little to no customization of the WLAN.
 
     By default, 80MHz channels were enabled. 
     By default, DFS was disabled. 
     By default, all APs were set to transmit at maximum power.
 

I agree with @WiFiTodd's assessment:

Life After the Red Pill. (or, CWNP & Me)

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes, 8 seconds. Contains 1427 words

To start off 2016 I wanted to give you an idea of my life before CWNP (Certified Wireless Network Professional), the benefits I have seen from the program, learning the intricacies of 802.11, and its affect on my business, and customers.

THE KNOWN UNKNOWNS

In 2007 I was hired by a large cabling company to start a new voice & data services business. I had been in voice since 1994, installing and maintaining large Nortel PBXs, as well as Windows Server Management (Active Directory, Exchange, ISS, etc.). The cabling company eventually decided they wanted to sell Wi-Fi so they asked me to research various vendors to partner with - and so I did. That was my introduction to wireless.

After deciding on our vendor I proceeded to take the prescribed classes and learned how to "program" their system. There was no discussion of RF in these classes, or encouragement to learn about such things. I got a paper that certified I knew what I was doing - so I figured I actually did. How hard could it be? It did not take long to realize it was pretty hard.

My first deployment was for a large Restaurant/Comedy Club/Event Facility and I "designed" the WLAN the way any normal, intelligent person would - I walk into the facility pointed to where I wanted the APs and marked it on a floorpan. The cabling techs ran the cable mounted the APs and I configured the system as I was taught.

When the inevitable problems arose upon the first event I was on the phone with TAC trying "fix the problem". Clearly their system was not doing what it promised. TAC enabled all various types of features to try to get things working. But, no matter what we did the wireless would fail.

It's only with hindsight, and experience, that I now know that APs don't work well from the concrete room where the sound guy is, or that two APs WILL NOT support 450 people no matter what the manufacturer tells you, or that setting APs to max power is not the answer to bad-fi. But, I digress...

INTO THE GREAT WIDE OPEN

I started my career in wireless in 2007, and then I started my own company in 2009. But, it wasn't until 2012(ish) that I hit the brick wall that set me on the path I now find myself. Because that's when I found a Web site called WLANPros.com, and a man named Keith Parsons, that seemed to know a lot about wireless. He mentioned things like, "RF", and "co-channel interference", and something called, "CWNP". By this time I had begun to think of myself as a wireless guy rather than a Voice, or Server guy and I was intrigued by people who understood wireless. Not my vendor of choice, but wireless - that invisible stuff that had alluded me for so long.

I started reading blogs, and finally making use of Twitter by following people such as Keith, Devin Akin, and Andrew von Nagy, among others. I started realizing just how little I knew about wireless, and how far I was from where I needed to be. And now I had the bug. I had to know wireless and its secrets.

My first step was to call Keith Parsons. I asked him about classes that he taught and told him that I wanted to learn more. He asked me questions that made me extremely uncomfortable, such as: "How do you survey?", "What tools do you use?", "Have you read the CWNA book?", among others. I finished that call knowing that I had left a path of poorly "designed" WLANs in my wake, and that I loved wireless. I purchased the CWNA Study Guide and started reading.

The results were immediate. I called up past customers and told them I would like do a free "wifi cleanup". I would go to their location and correct the wrongs I had done using the information I was learning from the CWNA book. Even relocating APs at my cost! I did this for a while and bought the book for new employees (and customers) so they could learn.

To me, getting the CWNA certification seemed unattainable - never mind CWNE, but in 2013 I signed up for a CWNA class taught by Robert Bartz. There were two things I learned in that class:

  1. I knew stuff! The past few years of reading and correcting my mistakes were really paying off.
  2. I knew nothing, but I wanted to learn more.

In December of 2013 I became a CWNA. I was now part of something I thought was out of my reach - a WLAN Professional.

DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE

alternate text

"You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."

―Morpheus

I was now getting to be known as "that guy who fixes wi-fi". I was being called in to fix, validate, design, because I knew how to get it done right. It was only yesterday that I was on the phone with TAC trying to figure out what button to press, what checkbox to check, to fix everything. Now, with the knowledge I had gained I was "the Fixer". I was "the Architect". I was the "Professional".

Then, at WLPC 2014, I made the decision to try for CWNE. In a year, no less! Sure, I would never make it - that was for the real professionals, but would I learn a lot. So I proceeded to study through the CWNP program.

I started with the CWAP. Packet Analysis was by far a weak point for me, and I knew if I could learn this secret code it could help me in the field. So, I bought the book and started reading. Within a few weeks I was at a Community College troubleshooting an issue with new HP clients not being able to connect to the WLAN, but only at one specific building. No better time than the present, so I open my packet analyzer and started capturing.

At first I didn't understand what I was seeing, but like Neo in the Matrix, it started to come together. I noticed the clients were sending disassociation frames to the APs. They did not want to stay connected. I looked at the beacons where the clients could connect. I looked at the beacons where the client could not connect. They were different. The beacons in the new building with the new APs showed they had the "RN Enabled Capabilities" Tag. The beacons where they could connect did not have 802.11k enabled.

I had done my first real-world, wireless packet analysis. And just like Neo, I could see into the Matrix and knew right away, "these client do not support 802.11k”, and they didn’t like connecting to a WLAN that did. One of the techs had enabled it on the new AP group because he heard, "it does something with roaming". The solution was to simply disable 802.11k and instantly the clients connected.

THE GIST OF IT ALL

That's CWNP to me. It's the Red Pill that let's you see the Matrix for what it is. But, it's not for everyone. Most don't want to travel that far down the rabbit hole and are happy with what the vendors tell them. "Check this box to fix roaming", "toggle that switch to increase your WLAN speeds by 50%", or "our APs are 175% faster than Cisco, Aruba, HP, & Ruckus... COMBINED".

Over the course of the following year I purchased the CWDP and CWSP and started reading those as well. My goal was now to run the gauntlet by WLPC 2015 in Dallas. In December 2014 I took another class with Robert Bartz and got my CWAP. Through January 2015, I self-studied for, took, and passed the CWDP and CWSP exams.

I had done it. What I thought was impossible for me - passing all the CWNP exams - was a reality. Thanks to the help and encouragement of an amazing community of wireless enthusiasts I had done in a year what I thought would take me 3, or 4.

Going through the CWNP program has resulted in a career I never thought I'd have. My customers have reaped the benefits of having someone who understand the fundamentals of why WLANs work, and I have seen the benefits in the growth of my business, and reputation, and a decrease in the Bad-Fi. I owe it all to the WLAN community and CWNP.